Honda Accord
 (3.3/5)
owner rating
from RM 1,981.04 /month
from RM 148,512.00 to RM 168,998.00

Owner Review

Share your experiences with the Honda Accord - Write an owner review

Do you own the Honda Accord? As the owner, you have literally sat in the driver's seat and discovered the ups and downs as you go about your everyday life.

Share your experiences with the Honda Accord and help others in the market for a car like this.

* limited to Malaysian citizens and verified owners of the reviewed car.
CarBase.my works with ISM Insurance Services to verify car ownership in order to ensure quality reviews.

5 Owner Reviews
Date Reviewed
25 September 2018
Performance
Ride & Handling
Comfort
Safety
Space
Value
Edwin
2.0 VTi-L (2014)
Bought new, Owned for 2 Years
Fuel Economy: 5.5 km/litre (18.2 L/100 km), RON95, Mileage: 2,000 km/month
    - Good handling
    - Stylish exterior looking
    - Largest interior space among its segment
    - Big audio display screen
    - Worst quality I had ever encountered
    - Body paint like "tofu", couldn't wipe exterior body with normal cloth, end up scratches all around
    - Daytime LED malfunction after 3 months in service
    - Power window motor noise
    - Car vibration during stopping at the middle of driving
To Improve
please improve quality instead of quantity!
No, I would not recommend this car
Date Reviewed
10 July 2018
Performance
Ride & Handling
Comfort
Safety
Space
Value
tzr
2.4 VTi-L (2016)
Bought new, Owned for 1 Year
Fuel Economy: 9.2 km/litre (10.9 L/100 km), RON95, Mileage: 10,000 km/month
    good space.. n/a engine
    quality is totally out. own the car less than a year.. headlamp changed via warranty due to watermark

    not solved:
    - door scrathing against fender due to gap clearance issue. so u can hear squeking sound sometime like old car haha. honda say its 2mm. but my unit have various gapbover bonnet, fender , door. worst than proton saga megavalve.

    - rear lamp scrathing body paint.. can see the grey undercoat. sent to panel workshop.. make it worst. finishing look like shit

    - 5 speed auto tranmission is funny for 2.4 engine
To Improve
quality
quality
quality

u can say to customer its ok u can always send it back to us. meaning u passing cost of qaqc to ur customer. u know the hassle of have to rent another car. im working outstation so only have weekend time for family and i have to manage all honda shit give to me

ur call center only following script which dont understand a car.. in the end the script will try to pass back all the blame to customer.. come on for less than a year 2.4 accord and all this issues?

avoid honda at all cost
No, I would not recommend this car
Date Reviewed
30 March 2017
Performance
Ride & Handling
Comfort
Safety
Space
Value
Regan
2.0 VTi-L (2015)
Bought new, Owned for 1 Year
Fuel Economy: 12.0 km/litre (8.3 L/100 km), RON97, Mileage: 3,000 km/month
    Good interior design compare other model in it class.
    Smooth handling and drive.
    Spacious.
    Bad service and problem solving from Honda Malaysia.
    Disc rotor and brake pads problem every 10000km, still haven't solved.
    Every 10000km need to either skim the rotor or replace the rotor including brake pads.
    Noisy cabin when car above 100k/ph speed.
To Improve
Improve service centre.
Find a permanent solution for the brake problems.
No, I would not recommend this car
Date Reviewed
11 January 2017
Performance
Ride & Handling
Comfort
Safety
Space
Value
Jerome
2.0 VTi-L (2013)
Bought new, Owned for 3 Years
Fuel Economy: 11.0 km/litre (9.1 L/100 km), RON95, Mileage: 1,800 km/month
    Better seat quality than Camry.
    Interior feature near to up market car.
    Very good handling.
    Fuel economy on highway drive. 15 km/lit
    Soft leather seat.
    Easy maneuver steering.
    When Vtec kick in lot of vroom.
    Sapcious back seat.
    aerodynamic body, faster you drive, better car stabilize.
    Car vibration after 1 year. Send back to Honda couldn't identify its problem.
    Honda service centre is worse.
    A litle bit bumpy ride, but handling are good from its stiff absorber.
    Original audio / speaker poor sound quality.
    Low torque, have to reach 3800 rpm. You just need to kick your padel hard if you need more power.
    Econ mode is nonsense, low power but fuel consumption not improve significant
To Improve
Sound proof. Better than Passat, but to be improve from Camry.
Yes, I would recommend this car
Date Reviewed
8 December 2016
Performance
Ride & Handling
Comfort
Safety
Space
Value
Adle
2.0 VTi (2013)
Bought new, Owned for 3 Years
Fuel Economy: 9.0 km/litre (11.1 L/100 km), RON97, Mileage: 2,000 km/month
    Car has decently good handling for the segment with accurate steering and good break feel. Handling is confidence inspiring. The car is good looking even with the standard 17" rims on the 2.0 version. Large boot and interior campacity with good design.
    Floaty ride on highway speed above 120km/h, bumps and road surfaces can be felt. Vibrations from the 2.0 Ivtec engine is transmitted into the cabin and is very noticible when the air con switches engages and disengages. NVH levels and refinement is not on par for a D segment car. Don't get a lot of kit on the 2.0 versions. Engine lacks urgency for overtaking and to pull away at the lights. Quality of fit and finish can be poor, especially the standard tires. Thirsty engine when floored.
To Improve
NVH and refinements, development of new engine or just fit the civic's new 1.5 turbo. Have a better tuned suspension and improve on fit and finish for local assembly.
No, I would not recommend this car

Honda Accord's Competitors